THE IMPACT OF VARIOUS FACTORS ON THE LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF AUGMENTATION MAMMOPLASTY USING SILICONE IMPLANTS

Authors
M.M. Ismoilov1;2 M.S. Saidov1;2 M.M. Saidov3
Job:
1 Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery 2 Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons of Tajikistan 3 Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
DOI:
10.65197/3106-4035-2025-1-2-52-61

Annotation

Resume.

Goal. To study factors influencing the development of unfavorable postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent augmentation mammoplasty

Material and methods. The Department of Reconstructive Surgery of the Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery and the ORMED Medical Center for Aesthetic and Laser Surgery included 190 patients who underwent augmentation mammoplasty between 2010 and 2024. All subjects included in the study were female. Thirtytwo women (16.8%) had a history of breast surgery prior to presentation. All procedures were for benign conditions (fibroids, incisions for mastitis); subjects with a history of malignant tumors were not included in the study.

Results. The overall duration of surgery was not related to age (46.7±13.3 in Group 1 and 48.2±15.6 in Group 2). No statistically significant differences were observed for this aspect of surgical time. However, in both groups, surgeries lasted longer in patients with a high body mass index: in Group 1, subjects with a high BMI lasted 56.7±16.1 compared to 42.4±15.5 in Group 2. A similar difference was observed in the second clinical group: those with a high BMI (57.3±15.2) versus a normal BMI (43.6±15.7). Hematomas of varying severity were observed in two patients in the under35 group and in four cases in women older than this age. Blood loss volume also varied between the groups. The average blood loss volume for women under 35 was 345.7±112.4 ml, while for women in the older age group, the average blood loss volume was 461.6±104.8 ml. In both cases, the parameters were within normal limits. s. No lifethreatening bleeding was observed. All hematomas were treated with drainage and rubber bands.

Conclusion. Thus, age is a significant factor when planning the volume of breast augmentation, as well as preventing complications in the immediate and late postoperative periods. The operating surgeon must take this into account when planning the augmentation.

Keywords

augmentation mammoplasty breast augmentation silicone implants mammary glands

Full text

The article is in PDF format

List of literature

  2. 1 Maximiliano J., Oliveira A.C.P., Lorencetti E., Bombardelli J., Portinho C.P., Deggerone D., Collares M.V. Breast augmentation: correlation between surgical planning and complication rates after surgery. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica. 2023; 32: 332-339.
  3. 2 Brown M.H., Hontscharuk R. Invited discussion on: reoperative augmentation mammaplasty: an algorithm to optimize implant soft-tissue support, pocket control and smooth implant stability with composite reverse inferior muscle sling and its technical variations. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022; 46(3): 1133-1134.
  4. 3 Saidov M.S., Khodzhamuradov G.M., Khodzhamuradova J.A., Ismoilov M.M. Choice of surgical approach in augmentation mammoplasty. Avicenna Bulletin. 2016; 1 (66): 35-39.
  5. 4 Rosenthal A., Goldbart Nahmias A., Heller L., Hadad E. Silicone lymphadenopathy following augmentation mammoplasty with silicone implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2024; 44(11): 1167-1175.
  6. 5 Montemurro P., Pietruski P. Twelve years and over 2400 implants later: augmentation mammoplasty risk factors based on a single plastic surgeon’s experience. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open. 2024; 12(4): e5720.
  7. 6 Fish M.L., Kelley R., Swanson M., Fostyk A., Foglietti M.A. Mastopexy with Augmentation Mammoplasty. 2024. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1007106.
  8. 7 Saidov M.S., Khodjamurodova J.A., Khodjamuradov G.M., Ismoilov M.M., Gulin A.V., Shaimanov A.Kh. Efficiency of augmentation mammoplasty depending on the shape and volume of the implant. Bulletin of Tambov State University. 2016; 21(2): 595-597. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2016-21-2-595-597.
  9. 8 Meretsky C.R., Knecht E.M., Schiuma A.T. Advantages and disadvantages of breast augmentation: surgical techniques, outcomes, and future directions. Cureus. 2024; 16(9): 1-20.
  10. 9 Domínguez-Millán R., Pisciotti T.L., Cuesta P.F., Becerril M.A.B. Fowler syndrome post-liposculpture and augmentation mammoplasty: Case report and literature review. JPRAS open. 2024; 42: 292-295.
  11. 10 Khodjamuradov G.M., Saidov M.S., Ismoilov M.M. Augmentation mammoplasty using large silicone implants. Avicenna Bulletin. 2016; 2 (67): 60-63.
  12. 11 Khodjamurodova J.A., Saidov M.S., Khodjamuradov G.M. Use of silicone implants in breast plastic surgery (literature review). Pavlov Russian Medical and Biological Bulletin (Ryazan), 2018; 26(1): 133-149. DOI: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ20181133-149.
  13. 12 Saidov M.S. Risk factors for complications of augmentation mammoplasty in the late postoperative period. Eurasian Scientific Medical Journal „Sino“. 2022; 3(2): 18-23. DOI: 10.54538/27075265_2022_3_2_18.
  14. 13 Saidov M.S. Capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of complications of implantation of silicone breast implants. Bulletin of Surgut State University. Medicine. 2022; 3(53): 51–54. DOI: 10.34822/2304-9448-2022-3-51-54.
  15. 14 Saidov M.S. Use of a modified three-layer suture in augmentation mammoplasty. Bulletin of the Smolensk State Medical Academy. 2023; 22(1): 121–125. DOI: 10.37903/vsgma.2023.1.16.
  16. 15 Issagholian L., Malkoc A., Vignaroli K.A., Miramontes M., Neeki C.C., Nguyen A., Neeki M.M. Lymphangiography and thoracic duct embolization for persistent chyle leak following augmentation mammoplasty and mastopexy. JPRAS open. 2024; 42: 191-196.
Information
Language

English

License

CC BY 4.0

Category

Plastic surgery

FINANCING

There was no financial support.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Исмоилов Мухторджон Маруфович
– кандидат медицинских наук, старший научный сотрудник отделения восста- новительной хирургии Республикан- ского научного центра сердечно-сосуди- стой хирургии, Душанбе, Таджикистан. E-mail: m.ismoilov@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344- 1810
Саидов Махмадулло Сайфуллоевич
– научный сотрудник отделения восста- новительной хирургии Республикан- ского научного центра сердечно-сосуди- стой хирургии, Душанбе, Таджикистан. E-mail: mahmad_jon1974@mail.ru
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9003- 1609
Саидов Манучехр Махмадуллоевич
– слушатель научного кружка кафедры хирургического болезней №2 имени академика Н.У.Усманов ГОУ “Таджик- ский государственный медицинский университет имени Абуали ибни Сино”, Душанбе, Таджикистан. E-mail: manuchehr.saidov12@gmail. com

*Correspondence address.